Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility: Application to tectonics and basin evolution

Penulis

  • Reza Syahputra Charles University

Kata Kunci:

Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility, Gondwana, Cadomian, Teplá-Barrandian unit, Tectonics

Abstrak

The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) was proposed over half a century ago and has earned tremendous popularity. The AMS method is a powerful quantitative tool for fabric analysis, especially in fine-grained sedimentary rocks that lack macroscopically observable paleocurrent indicators. In addition, the AMS has proven as an extremely sensitive indicator to record ‛invisible’ deformational fabrics. Thus, the AMS is increasingly used to characterize the preferred orientation of magnetic minerals from depositional to tectonic setting within a given basin, with the benefit of potentially recording weak upper-crustal strains. The AMS was tested in a sequential geological setting along the northern edge of Gondwana during the Neoproterozoic–Cambrian. The objective of this research is to find the timing and mechanism operated on the northern margin of Gondwana during active-pasive margin transition. In the Cadomian terranes, after the active Cadomian orogeny ceased, several diverse compositional plutons intruded the Teplá–Barrandian unit of the Bohemian Massif. The AMS data are able to differentiate the pre-, syn-, and post-plutonism structures (The Kdyně pluton, the Czech Republic). The possible geodynamic causes of this event were interpreted as a result of a slab break-off. Following this plutonism, the crust at the surface evolved as a graben-type structure of the Příbram–Jince basin (the Czech Republic). The AMS has successfully revealed the paleocurrent direction changes in this sedimentary basin, which was related to the change of tectonic regime.

Referensi

Borradaile, G., Henry, B., 1997. Tectonic applications of magnetic susceptibility and its anisotropy. Earth Sci. Rev. 42, 49–93.

Borradaile, G.J., Jackson, M., 2004. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS): magnetic petrofabrics of deformed rocks. Geol. Soc. London, Special Publications 238, 299–360.

Borradaile, G.J., Jackson, M., 2010. Structural geology, petrofabrics and magnetic fabrics (AMS, AARM, AIRM). J. Struct. Geol. 32, 1519–1551.

Cháb, J., Stráník, Z., and Eliáš, M., 2007. Geological map of the Czech Republic 1:500,000: Czech Geological Survey.

Hajná, J., Žák, J., Dörr, W., Kachlík, V., Sláma, J., 2018. New constraints from detrital zircon ages on prolonged, multiphase transition from the Cadomian accretionary orogen to a passive margin of Gondwana. Precambr. Res. 317, 159–178.

Havlíček, V., 1971. Stratigraphy of the Cambrian of Central Bohemia. J. Geol. Sci. Geol. 20, 7–52.

Hrouda, F., 1982. Magnetic anisotropy of rocks and its application in geology and geophysics. Geophys. Surveys 5, 37–82.

Janák, F. 1965. Determination of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of rocks. Stud. Geophys. Geod. 9, 290–301.

Jelinek, V. 1981. Characterization of the magnetic fabric or rocks. Tectonophysics 79, 63–7.

Kukal, Z., 1971. Sedimentology of Cambrian deposits of the Barrandian area (Central Bohemia). J. Geol. Sci., Geol. 20, 53–100.

Nagata, T., 1961. Rock Magnetism. Maruzen, Tokyo, 350.

Nance, R.D., Gutierréz-Alonso, G., Keppie, J.D., Linnemann, U., Murphy, J.B., Quesada, C., Strachan, R.A., Woodcock, N.H., 2010. Evolution of the Rheic Ocean. Gondwana Research 17, 194–222.

Nance, R.D., Murphy, J.B., Keppie, J.D., 2002. A Cordilleran model for the evolution of Avalonia. Tectonophysics 352, 11–31.

Tarling, D. and Hrouda, F., 1993. Magnetic anisotropy of rocks. Chapman & Hall, London.Boggs, S. (2014).

Diterbitkan

23-10-2024

Cara Mengutip

Syahputra, R. “Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility: Application to Tectonics and Basin Evolution”. Jurnal Geosains Terapan, vol. 6, no. 2, Oktober 2024, https://geosainsterapan.id/index.php/id/article/view/114.

Terbitan

Bagian

Artikel Ilmiah

Kategori